Sir James Cleverlysettoreturnto Toryfrontbenchasshadowhousingsecretary

Published in House and Home on Tuesday, July 22nd 2025 at 9:54 GMT by London Evening Standard
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Sir James served in the foreign office and as home secretary when the Conservatives were in power.

Tories Launch Fierce Attack on Angela Rayner Over Housing Policy U-Turn, Accusing Labour of Betraying Homeowners

In a heated escalation of political tensions, Conservative Party figures have unleashed a barrage of criticism against Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner, accusing her of abandoning key housing commitments and undermining efforts to address Britain's chronic housing shortage. The controversy centers on the Labour government's recent decision to scrap mandatory local housing targets, a move that has drawn sharp rebukes from opposition leaders including former Home Secretary James Cleverly and ex-Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch. Shadow Housing Minister Nigel Huddleston has also joined the fray, labeling the policy shift as a "capitulation to NIMBYism" that will exacerbate the nation's affordability crisis.

The row erupted following an announcement from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), where Rayner serves as Secretary of State. Under the previous Conservative administration, local councils were required to meet specific housing quotas as part of a broader strategy to boost supply and tackle soaring property prices. However, the new Labour government, led by Prime Minister Keir Starmer, has opted to replace these binding targets with more flexible "advisory" guidelines, arguing that the old system was overly prescriptive and failed to account for regional variations. Rayner defended the change in a statement, emphasizing that it would empower local authorities to make decisions based on community needs rather than top-down impositions from Whitehall.

James Cleverly, who has been vocal in his opposition to Labour's early policy moves since the party's landslide victory in the July general election, wasted no time in condemning the decision. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, Cleverly described the U-turn as "a betrayal of a generation of young people desperate to get on the housing ladder." He argued that mandatory targets, while imperfect, had at least provided a framework for consistent development across the country. "Angela Rayner talks a big game about building homes, but this is nothing more than a retreat in the face of local opposition," Cleverly said. "Labour promised to fix the housing crisis, but they're already folding under pressure from their own backbenchers and anti-development lobbyists."

Cleverly's comments echo broader Conservative frustrations with Labour's governance style in its first months in power. The Tories have positioned themselves as the party of aspiration, contrasting their record on housing—despite criticisms of under-delivery—with what they portray as Labour's indecisiveness. During the election campaign, Starmer and Rayner pledged to build 1.5 million new homes over five years, a target that many experts viewed as ambitious but necessary to address the shortfall estimated at around 4.3 million homes needed by 2040, according to reports from organizations like the Centre for Cities. However, the scrapping of mandatory targets has raised doubts about how this goal will be achieved without enforceable mechanisms.

Kemi Badenoch, a prominent figure on the Conservative right and a potential leadership contender, amplified the attack by focusing on the economic implications. In a series of social media posts and an op-ed in a national newspaper, Badenoch accused Rayner of prioritizing "ideological purity over practical solutions." She pointed out that under the previous system, areas with high demand, such as London and the South East, were compelled to plan for significant growth, which helped stimulate economic activity through construction jobs and infrastructure investment. "This isn't just about houses; it's about opportunity," Badenoch wrote. "By ditching targets, Labour is signaling to investors that Britain is closed for business. Angela Rayner might think she's protecting green belts, but she's actually condemning families to a lifetime of renting in overcrowded conditions."

Badenoch's intervention adds a layer of ideological clash to the debate. As a self-described free-market advocate, she has long championed deregulation in planning laws to unleash private sector innovation. Her criticism ties into a narrative that Labour, with its roots in trade unions and public sector advocacy, is inherently hostile to the kind of bold reforms needed to spur housing supply. This perspective is not without controversy; critics of the Conservative era argue that their policies favored developers over communities, leading to substandard builds and insufficient affordable housing. Nonetheless, Badenoch's pointed remarks have resonated with Tory grassroots, who see the housing row as an opportunity to regain momentum after their electoral drubbing.

Nigel Huddleston, serving as the shadow housing minister, has taken a more granular approach in his critique, delving into the specifics of the MHCLG's policy framework. In a parliamentary question session, Huddleston grilled Rayner on how the advisory targets would be monitored and enforced, warning that without teeth, they risk becoming "meaningless suggestions ignored by councils eager to appease vocal minorities." He referenced data from the Office for National Statistics showing that housing completions fell short of targets in over 70% of local authorities last year, attributing this to bureaucratic hurdles and local resistance. "Angela Rayner is essentially handing a veto to NIMBY campaigners," Huddleston stated, using the acronym for "Not In My Back Yard" to describe those opposed to new developments. "This government came to power promising change, but on housing, they're offering more of the same excuses we've heard for decades."

Rayner, known for her combative style and working-class roots, has not shied away from responding to the onslaught. In a robust defense during Prime Minister's Questions, she accused the Conservatives of hypocrisy, highlighting their own failures to meet housing goals during 14 years in power. "The Tories left us with a broken system where targets were set but never achieved because they lacked the political will to confront vested interests," Rayner fired back. She outlined Labour's alternative vision, which includes reforms to the planning system, increased funding for social housing, and incentives for brownfield site development to protect green spaces. "We're not scrapping ambition; we're making it realistic and fair," she added, pledging that the 1.5 million homes target remains firm, supported by new measures like compulsory purchase orders for unused land.

The dispute has broader implications for UK politics, underscoring the challenges Labour faces in delivering on its manifesto promises amid economic constraints and local pushback. Housing remains one of the most pressing issues for voters, with polls from YouGov indicating that over 60% of under-35s cite affordability as their top concern. Experts like those at the Resolution Foundation have warned that without aggressive action, intergenerational inequality will worsen, as younger people are locked out of homeownership. The government's decision to consult on the new advisory system over the coming months could provide further ammunition for critics if delays emerge.

This isn't the first clash between Rayner and her Tory counterparts. Since assuming her dual role as Deputy PM and Housing Secretary, she has been a lightning rod for opposition attacks, from her handling of regional devolution to her outspoken views on workers' rights. Cleverly and Badenoch, both eyeing potential leadership bids in a post-Sunak Conservative Party, appear to be using this issue to burnish their credentials as defenders of economic growth and opportunity. Huddleston, meanwhile, is positioning himself as a detail-oriented shadow minister capable of holding the government to account on policy minutiae.

As the debate rages on, it highlights the enduring partisan divide over how to solve Britain's housing woes. Conservatives advocate for market-driven solutions with enforceable targets, while Labour emphasizes community-led approaches and sustainability. With the next local elections on the horizon and public scrutiny intensifying, Rayner's ability to navigate this storm will be crucial to Labour's credibility on one of its flagship issues. Whether this policy shift proves to be a pragmatic adjustment or a strategic misstep remains to be seen, but for now, it has ignited a fierce political battle that shows no signs of abating.

In the wider context, this row reflects deeper societal tensions. Urban areas grapple with overcrowding and high rents, while rural communities fear overdevelopment eroding their way of life. The MHCLG's role in balancing these interests is pivotal, and Rayner's stewardship will be judged not just on rhetoric but on tangible outcomes like the number of homes built and affordability metrics. As both sides trade barbs, the real losers could be the millions of Britons still waiting for a place to call home.

(Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full London Evening Standard Article at:
[ https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/james-cleverly-kemi-badenoch-nigel-huddleston-angela-rayner-mhclg-b1239455.html ]

N※N

Sir James Cleverlysettoreturnto Toryfrontbenchasshadowhousingsecretary

Tories Launch Fierce Attack on Angela Rayner Over Housing Policy U-Turn, Accusing Labour of Betraying Homeowners