N※N

Marilyn Monroe Estate Owners Sue Los Angeles Mayor

  //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2026/02/0 .. -monroe-estate-owners-sue-los-angeles-mayor.html
  Published in House and Home on Monday, February 9th 2026 at 10:38 GMT by Press-Telegram
      Locales: California, UNITED STATES

Brentwood, CA - February 9, 2026 - A legal battle is brewing in the heart of Brentwood as the owners of the estate where Marilyn Monroe tragically died have filed a lawsuit against Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, alleging the city has systematically failed to protect the property's historical integrity. The suit claims years of inaction and allowance of unauthorized construction in the surrounding area have eroded the value and significance of the iconic landmark located at 12905 West Drive.

The property, a mid-century modern residence, has long been a focal point for preservationists and fans of the legendary actress. Purchased by the current owners in 2018, the estate immediately became a passion project dedicated to careful restoration and the safeguarding of its historical character. However, the owners argue that their efforts have been consistently undermined by the city of Los Angeles's alleged lack of oversight and enforcement of existing landmark protections.

"This isn't simply about property value; it's about preserving a piece of American history," stated attorney Jeffrey Greene, lead counsel for the plaintiffs. "We've documented numerous instances of construction projects near the estate that violate established guidelines for historical preservation. These projects aren't just an eyesore; they are actively diminishing the unique atmosphere and contextual integrity that make this property so important. The city has been unresponsive to our repeated concerns, leaving us with no alternative but to seek judicial intervention."

The lawsuit details specific instances of alleged violations, including the construction of larger-scale homes on adjacent properties that obstruct views from the Monroe estate, alterations to landscaping that clash with the original design aesthetic, and a perceived lack of enforcement regarding building height restrictions in the area. The owners claim these developments have not only visually impacted the property but have also created logistical challenges for restoration efforts, such as increased traffic and noise pollution.

Monroe's death at the estate in 1962 remains a subject of intense public fascination and speculation. The property itself has become inextricably linked to her final days, drawing visitors and serving as a poignant reminder of her life and untimely passing. The owners emphasize their commitment to honoring Monroe's memory by preserving the house as authentically as possible. They envision a future where the estate could potentially be opened to the public for limited tours, providing a respectful and educational experience for fans.

However, they argue that achieving this vision is impossible if the city continues to allow unchecked development around the property. "The city has a responsibility to recognize the cultural and historical importance of this site," Greene added. "It's not just about adhering to the letter of the law; it's about demonstrating a commitment to preserving our collective heritage."

Mayor Bass's office released a brief statement acknowledging the lawsuit, stating that the city is "carefully reviewing the claims" and remains "open to a constructive dialogue" with the property owners. However, the statement stopped short of addressing the specific allegations of inaction or promising any concrete steps to address the concerns raised. The city's response is being closely watched by preservation groups and legal experts, who see this case as a potential bellwether for future landmark preservation disputes in Los Angeles.

The debate over preserving historical landmarks in Los Angeles is particularly fraught, given the city's rapid growth and development pressures. Balancing the desire for progress with the need to protect cultural heritage is a constant challenge. This lawsuit highlights the difficulties faced by property owners who are committed to preserving historical sites and the potential for conflict when local governments are perceived as prioritizing development over preservation. The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for how Los Angeles approaches the protection of its iconic landmarks in the years to come. Court observers predict a lengthy legal process, potentially involving expert testimony on historical preservation, property values, and the impact of surrounding development.