N※N

Trump administrations plans deep cuts to homeless housing

  //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2025/09/3 .. rations-plans-deep-cuts-to-homeless-housing.html
  Published in House and Home on Tuesday, September 30th 2025 at 15:16 GMT by HousingWire
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Trump Administration Aims to Trim Homeless‑Housing Funding by a Third

The U.S. federal government is poised to slash funding for the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) homeless‑services programs, a move that could reduce the federal budget allocated to homeless shelters, transitional housing and supportive services by as much as 30 percent. The plan was unveiled in a memo circulated by the Trump administration in March, and it is expected to be included in the 2024 budget request that will be sent to Congress in the coming weeks.

Where the Cuts Come From

The memo cites “budgetary constraints” and a need to “streamline federal involvement in housing” as the principal reasons for the proposed cuts. The plan would target the Office of Community Services (OCS), the department’s flagship program that oversees the federal funding of homeless shelters, emergency shelters, transitional housing and rapid‑reentry programs. The OCS currently receives roughly $1.3 billion annually, and the new proposal would trim that amount by approximately $300 million—roughly a 23 percent reduction.

In addition to the direct cut to OCS, the memo recommends reducing the federal share of the Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) program, which subsidizes rental vouchers for low‑income families. The HAP cut would be implemented by a new rule that would reduce the federal subsidy portion of the vouchers by 15 percent, shifting the burden onto local and state agencies. A link in the memo points to the HUD guidance on how HAP funding is calculated, indicating that the new rule would have to be implemented within the next 12 months.

What the Cuts Mean on the Ground

Experts and advocates argue that the cuts will have an immediate impact on the most vulnerable communities. The OCS program funds the “Housing First” model—an approach that prioritizes permanent housing over temporary shelters and couples it with mental‑health and substance‑use treatment. By cutting OCS’s budget, the Trump administration would effectively cut the money that supports these critical services.

According to a linked research report from the Urban Institute, the “Housing First” approach has been shown to reduce chronic homelessness by 30 percent in cities that fully fund it. The report also noted that every $1 million invested in permanent housing yields a return of $5–$6 million in reduced health‑care, criminal‑justice and social‑service costs. Removing this level of funding, advocates say, could reverse decades of progress.

The HAP subsidy cut, meanwhile, would force many local housing agencies to increase the rental‑voucher contribution from tenants. Local governments are already struggling to keep up with rising rent costs, and many of them have already reduced their own funding for the program in response to federal cuts.

Political Reactions

The memo was met with swift criticism from the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO). In a statement linked to the article, NAHRO warned that the cuts could “significantly reduce the number of families that receive assistance for stable housing” and could lead to a spike in the federal homeless count.

In contrast, a spokesperson for HUD’s Office of Planning and Policy praised the cuts as “necessary to reduce federal bureaucracy and encourage states to take more responsibility for local housing solutions.” The spokesperson highlighted that the administration would “reallocate resources to support new private‑sector initiatives” that the department had been funding in pilot projects, such as the “Build to Buy” program in several mid‑size cities.

Context: A Trend Toward Reduced Federal Role

The proposed cuts are part of a broader trend of the Trump administration to shrink the federal role in social services. Similar moves have been made in other areas, including a reduction of the federal share in the National Housing Trust Fund and a push to limit the scope of HUD’s “Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS” program. The memo references a policy paper titled “A New Vision for Housing Policy” that outlines the administration’s long‑term goal of cutting the federal housing budget by 20 percent over the next five years.

What’s Next?

The next steps involve the Treasury’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewing the proposed cuts for compliance with the federal budget reconciliation process. Once approved, the cuts would be incorporated into the 2024 budget request, which will be presented to Congress in late June. The article’s linked congressional brief suggests that if the cuts are approved, they could be contested by the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

In the meantime, HUD officials are holding a series of regional town‑hall meetings with state housing agencies to explain the changes and discuss potential funding alternatives. The linked “Regional Funding Strategy Guide” includes a section on how states could secure additional federal money by participating in the Housing Equity Partnership Program, which offers match‑funding for state‑initiated affordable‑housing projects.

Bottom Line

The Trump administration’s plan to slash homeless‑housing funding represents a decisive shift toward reduced federal spending in the housing sector. While the administration frames the cuts as a way to streamline bureaucracy and empower states, critics warn that the move threatens to destabilize programs that have been shown to keep families off the streets and reduce long‑term social costs. As the budget request moves through Congress, the debate over the federal role in combating homelessness is sure to intensify—highlighting the delicate balance between fiscal restraint and the imperative to provide housing security for the nation’s most vulnerable.