N※N

Voters deal blow to suburban housing development

  //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2025/11/0 .. s-deal-blow-to-suburban-housing-development.html
  Published in House and Home on Wednesday, November 5th 2025 at 1:36 GMT by The Cincinnati Enquirer

Batavia Township Rejects Proposed Development in a Narrow Vote

On Thursday, November 4, 2025, the council of Batavia Township in Hamilton County, Ohio, voted 4‑3 to deny a long‑anticipated mixed‑use development project that would have added residential units, retail space, and a small hotel near the intersection of Interstate 75 and Route 122. The decision comes after months of debate, public hearings, and a contentious campaign that saw residents, local businesses, and developers all weighing in on the future of the township’s land use.

The Project in Question

The developer, Horizon Residential LLC, had submitted a comprehensive plan in August 2025 for a 10‑acre parcel on the north side of Route 122. The proposal, called “Northgate Crossing,” would include 200 townhomes, 20,000 square feet of commercial space for a grocery store, a boutique hotel, and a public park. Horizon’s design team emphasized energy‑efficient building materials, a 15‑parking‑space bike‑parking lot, and a “green corridor” that would connect to the existing Buckeye Trail.

In the lead‑up to the vote, Horizon’s spokesperson, Maria Gonzalez, argued that the project would create jobs, increase the township’s tax base, and provide much‑needed housing for the region. “The county is experiencing a housing crunch,” Gonzalez said. “We can’t let a prime piece of land sit idle while families are priced out of the area.”

Opposition and Environmental Concerns

Opponents of the development raised a range of concerns. Residents cited traffic congestion on Route 122, especially during rush hour, and the potential strain on local schools. The township’s transportation planning department had projected that the addition of 200 residential units would increase traffic volumes by up to 30 percent on the main arterial.

Environmental groups pointed to the nearby floodplain of the Little Miami River. According to a 2023 environmental assessment from the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, the site’s wetlands are protected under state law. Critics argued that the developer’s plans would reduce the wetlands by 2.5 acres, compromising storm‑water absorption and habitat for migratory birds.

“Even with the proposed green corridor, the loss of wetland habitat is unacceptable,” said Lisa Thompson, a board member of the Friends of the Little Miami. “We need to preserve these ecosystems, especially in a time when flooding events are becoming more frequent.”

The Council’s Decision

During the council meeting, which was open to the public and streamed live on the township’s website, several council members voiced their positions. Democratic councilmember Tom Reynolds, who sits on the township’s planning and zoning committee, expressed his disappointment. “I had hoped the development would bring much‑needed growth, but after reviewing the traffic studies, environmental reports, and community feedback, I cannot support it,” he said.

Opposing Reynolds, Republican councilmember Karen Lee argued that the project’s benefits outweighed the risks. “We’re not just talking about buildings; we’re talking about revitalizing the area, increasing the county’s revenue, and providing housing for people who want to stay close to Cincinnati,” Lee said.

The final vote—4 to 3 in favor of rejecting the proposal—was decided by the motion of councilmember Lisa Patel, who voted “no” and had a tie-breaking vote in her favor. The only councilmembers who supported the project were Lee, David Miller, and the mayor of the nearby city of Sycamore, who had a seat on the board of trustees.

Aftermath and Next Steps

Horizon Residential stated that it would file an appeal with the Hamilton County Planning Commission. “We respect the council’s decision, but we believe we can address the concerns raised and offer a revised plan that meets the township’s standards,” Gonzalez said.

In the meantime, the township is moving forward with a new, smaller-scale commercial project—a 5,000‑square‑foot medical clinic—approved last month, which residents have welcomed. The clinic will house a primary care practice and a physical therapy center, and it is expected to create 15 full‑time jobs.

Councilmember Reynolds announced that the township will conduct a comprehensive traffic impact study to determine if future development proposals can be accommodated without significantly worsening congestion. “We’ll look into road upgrades, public transportation options, and other mitigation measures,” he said.

Community Reactions

In the days following the vote, the township’s social media channels were flooded with comments. Many residents expressed relief that the development would not go ahead, citing concerns about “the future of the local environment and the quality of life.” Others urged the council to re‑evaluate the project, citing the need for affordable housing and economic diversification.

The debate over Northgate Crossing reflects broader regional tensions between growth and conservation that have shaped Cincinnati’s suburbs for decades. As Ohio’s population continues to grow, the question of how to balance development with community values will remain at the forefront of local politics.

For more details on the council’s voting record and the full development proposal, residents can access the township’s public records portal, which includes the official minutes of the November 4 meeting and Horizon’s original submission documents.