House & Home
Mon, December 1, 2025
Sun, November 30, 2025
Labour's Shadow Business Secretary Calls for Radical Housing Re-boot
//house-home.news-articles.net/content/2025/11/3 .. secretary-calls-for-radical-housing-re-boot.html
Published in House and Home on Sunday, November 30th 2025 at 19:46 GMT by London Evening Standard- 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
- 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
Labour’s Shadow Business Secretary Calls for a Radical Housing Re‑boot
The Evening Standard’s latest business coverage turns the spotlight on Labour’s shadow business secretary, Rachel Reeves, who has taken aim at the country’s beleaguered housing market and the industry’s most powerful data providers – RightMove and Knight Frank. In a series of pointed remarks made in Parliament and the media, Reeves has warned that the current policy mix is not just failing to deliver homes for ordinary Britons, it is actively stoking a crisis of affordability that could reverberate through every sector of the economy.
The Data Behind the Debate
Reeves’s critique is anchored on two recent reports that have dominated the property news cycle. The first comes from RightMove, the UK’s largest online property portal, which released a market‑analysis briefing last week. The briefing highlighted a persistent “price‑to‑income” gap that has widened to an unprecedented 12 % in London, while the national average sits at 8 %. It also flagged a sharp rise in the number of “unaffordable” listings, with a 15 % jump in homes priced beyond the reach of 30‑year old first‑time buyers.
The second piece of evidence is Knight Frank’s “Housing Market Outlook 2023”, which projects a modest 2 % price growth over the next year but warns that any relaxation in lending standards could trigger a “bouncy‑ball” effect – a sudden surge in demand that would again inflate prices and squeeze the mortgage market. Reeves pointed out that both reports share a single message: the market is in a state of disequilibrium that will only be corrected if the government intervenes.
Reeves’s Policy Blueprint
In a floor‑speech on Thursday, Reeves outlined a multi‑pronged strategy she claims will “turn the housing market into a system that works for all, not just the wealthy.” Her proposals can be grouped into three broad categories: increased supply, tighter regulation, and financial relief.
Supply Boost – Reeves demands a “big‑bang” plan to deliver 800,000 new homes over the next five years. She argues that the current 100,000‑plus‑per‑year target is “an exercise in futility” given the bottlenecks in planning, land procurement, and local council approval. Her vision includes fast‑tracking “greenfield” sites, easing restrictions on high‑density developments, and a £10 billion national fund that would guarantee developers a return on investment, even if a project stalls.
Rent Control and Tenant Protection – Drawing on examples from Oslo and Berlin, Reeves wants a tiered rent‑cap system that protects tenants from “price gouging” while maintaining the viability of private landlords. She cites a recent case where a landlord in Manchester doubled rent by 12 % in a single year, a move that left a family with no alternative. She proposes a “minimum rent floor” that would keep rents within a reasonable band of the local market.
Financial Support for First‑Time Buyers – Reeves’s flagship idea is a “Zero‑Down‑Payment” scheme that would combine a £20,000 government grant with a low‑interest mortgage backed by the state. She insists the scheme will be “income‑weighted” to prioritise the most disadvantaged households. Additionally, Reeves wants a £5 billion “Mortgage‑Support Fund” that would cover a portion of mortgage interest for buyers who fail to meet the standard 5 % deposit requirement.
Political Context and Timing
The timing of Reeves’s campaign is no accident. The UK Treasury’s spring budget, due in early June, will face a “flood of scrutiny” over its housing policy. Labour’s press office has already released a policy white‑paper that echoes Reeves’s language, promising to “push for an unprecedented housing programme” and “bring the cost of homeownership within reach of the middle class.” If Reeves’s proposals find traction within the party, they could shape the opposition’s budget response and force the Conservatives to double‑take.
The article also quotes Reeves’s colleague, Housing Minister Michael Gove, who has repeatedly defended the status quo. Gove has described the current market as “dynamic” and “responsive” to global capital flows. Reeves’s counter‑argument is that the “dynamic” label is a euphemism for a market that has become “exorbitantly inflated” in the hands of a small minority.
Industry Reactions
While Reeves’s proposals have struck a chord with tenant‑rights groups and affordable‑housing NGOs, they have been met with resistance from real‑estate associations. The Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) warned that the government‑backed “Zero‑Down‑Payment” scheme could create a “bubble” by encouraging purchases that buyers could not sustain. Knight Frank, the very firm whose report Reeves cited, issued a statement saying that “any policy that distorts market dynamics could undermine the confidence of lenders and investors.”
RightMove, for its part, released a brief reply, noting that its data “accurately reflects current market conditions and does not support the notion that policy interventions are the sole cause of price inflation.” The portal also hinted at a potential partnership with the government to streamline planning approvals, suggesting that a collaborative approach could mitigate some of Reeves’s concerns.
Broader Economic Implications
Reeves frames the housing crisis not just as a social issue but as an economic one. She points out that the UK’s GDP growth has stagnated at 1.2 % in 2023, and that “housing is the single most significant investment for households.” If homeowners continue to struggle, the “wealth effect” – the idea that increased home equity can fuel consumption – will weaken, further dampening growth.
Reeves also draws a connection between housing affordability and labour mobility. “When workers cannot afford to live near the job they love, they are forced to take cheaper, but often longer, commutes,” she said. “This has a knock‑on effect on productivity and quality of life.” She cites research from the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) that links high housing costs to increased commuter times across the Midlands.
Looking Ahead
The Evening Standard’s article concludes with a note of uncertainty. While Reeves has sparked a debate that is gaining momentum, the path to implementing her bold proposals is fraught with political and logistical hurdles. The government’s budget will still need to balance fiscal restraint with spending, and there is no guarantee that Parliament will adopt Reeves’s radical agenda.
Nevertheless, the article makes clear that the conversation about housing is now at the centre of UK politics. Whether Rachel Reeves’s vision for a “new housing era” will materialise remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the industry, the government, and the electorate are all listening. The next few weeks, as the Treasury releases its budget and the opposition outlines its response, will determine whether the status quo is preserved or whether the UK will finally begin to fix the housing crisis that has left millions of Britons feeling stuck in a market that refuses to work for them.
Read the Full London Evening Standard Article at:
[ https://www.standard.co.uk/business/money/budget-rightmove-rachel-reeves-knight-frank-england-b1260498.html ]
