Roe Green Development Vote: 2150 Homes Face Scrutiny

  //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2026/02/0 .. n-development-vote-2150-homes-face-scrutiny.html
  Published in House and Home on Saturday, February 7th 2026 at 7:21 GMT by Manchester Evening News
      Locales: Greater Manchester, UNITED KINGDOM

Roe Green Development: Crucial Vote Looms Over 2150-Home Scheme in Greater Manchester

The future of the contentious Roe Green housing development, proposing 2150 new homes in Ramsbottom, Greater Manchester, rests on a knife-edge as Bury Council's planning committee prepares to vote on the revised plans this Thursday. What began as a seemingly straightforward housing project has become a battleground between developers, local residents, and council members, highlighting the growing tensions surrounding housing development in already strained areas.

The initial approval granted to Russell Homes in 2021 was swiftly challenged by concerned citizens, leading to a High Court ruling that quashed the original permission. This legal victory, however, proved temporary, as Russell Homes resubmitted the application, triggering a new round of scrutiny and debate. The core issue remains: can Ramsbottom's infrastructure realistically absorb an influx of over 2000 new households?

The proposed development, situated on farmland off Bury New Road, encompasses a mix of housing types - 1,595 houses, 322 flats, and 233 bungalows. While proponents tout the much-needed housing as a solution to regional shortages, opponents paint a grim picture of overwhelmed roads, overburdened schools, and a diminishing quality of life for existing residents. The sheer scale of the project is at the heart of the resistance, with many arguing that Ramsbottom simply isn't equipped to handle such significant population growth.

Bury Council's own highways team estimates that the development will generate an additional 1,071 vehicle trips per day during peak hours. This projection fuels fears of "gridlock" on Bury New Road, a key arterial route already experiencing congestion. Critics argue that even with the GBP17.3 million pledged by Russell Homes towards infrastructure improvements, the impact will be substantial and irreversible. The promised upgrades, which include road modifications and school expansions, are seen by many as insufficient to offset the long-term strain on local amenities.

The objections aren't limited to traffic. Local schools are already operating near capacity, and healthcare services are stretched thin. Residents worry that the influx of new families will exacerbate these existing pressures, potentially compromising the quality of education and healthcare available to everyone. Furthermore, the loss of valuable green space and the impact on the local environment are significant concerns for many, especially given the growing emphasis on sustainability and biodiversity.

Despite the overwhelming number of objections - a total of 216, contrasted with only 25 letters of support - Bury Council planning officers are still recommending approval. Their rationale centers on the perceived benefits of providing much-needed housing, aligning with broader regional and national housing targets. This recommendation has drawn sharp criticism from local councillors and campaign groups, who accuse the council of prioritizing development over the well-being of its constituents.

The situation encapsulates a wider trend across the UK: the pressure to build new homes to address the housing crisis often clashes with the concerns of local communities who fear the loss of local character and the erosion of public services. This case is particularly poignant because of the prior legal challenge, indicating a deep-seated and persistent opposition to the Roe Green development.

Thursday's vote isn't simply about bricks and mortar; it's about the future of Ramsbottom and the balance between economic development and the quality of life for its residents. The planning committee faces a difficult decision, weighing the perceived benefits of new housing against the legitimate fears of those who will be most directly impacted. The outcome will likely set a precedent for future developments in Greater Manchester, shaping the region's approach to housing and infrastructure planning for years to come. Residents are mobilizing, preparing to attend the meeting and voice their concerns one last time before the committee renders its decision. The tension is palpable, and the stakes are high.