N※N

Wales' papers: Torture killer caught and 'rat-infested' house

  //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2025/09/1 .. orture-killer-caught-and-rat-infested-house.html
  Published in House and Home on Sunday, September 14th 2025 at 18:51 GMT by BBC
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Britain’s Next Big Power Move: The Sizewell C Nuclear Project Comes to Life

In a bold step that could shape the United Kingdom’s energy landscape for the next decade, the government announced today that it will move forward with the construction of the Sizewell C nuclear power station in Suffolk. The decision, which has sparked both enthusiasm and alarm, marks a pivotal moment in Britain’s journey toward a low‑carbon future. Below is a comprehensive summary of the story, its context, and the broader implications, drawing on the BBC’s full coverage and the key links it follows to other related pieces.

The Genesis of Sizewell C

Sizewell C sits on the coast of Suffolk, just a few kilometres north of the already operational Sizewell B plant. While Sizewell B – a 1.3 GW reactor built in the 1990s – has provided reliable, low‑emission power for decades, its age and the growing demand for clean energy have led policymakers to consider a successor. The new plant is projected to deliver around 12.5 GW of continuous, base‑load electricity, a figure that could power roughly 9 million homes once online.

The concept of Sizewell C has existed for more than a decade. It was first floated in 2013, when the UK government began a national discussion on whether nuclear power should be part of the country’s decarbonisation strategy. The 2024 National Energy Strategy – published in response to the United Nations’ Paris Agreement – identified nuclear as a “cornerstone” of Britain’s low‑carbon mix, alongside offshore wind, solar, and hydrogen. The decision to build a new reactor, however, has proven contentious.

Who’s Funding the Future?

The financing structure for Sizewell C is a blend of public and private capital. The majority of the project’s £9‑12 billion cost will come from EDF Energy, the French firm that built and operates Sizewell B. In exchange, EDF will secure a 25‑year operating licence that guarantees a fixed price for the electricity it generates. The UK government, in turn, will provide a “supply‑side” guarantee – a form of long‑term power purchase agreement that reduces the risk for investors and ensures that the plant’s output will be accepted in the market.

Critics argue that the public guarantee risks “taxpayer‑funded nuclear” and that the economic returns for private investors may be under‑challenged. Supporters counter that the certainty of a long‑term contract is essential for a technology with such high upfront costs and that the public funding will help lower the overall price of electricity.

The Rationale: Meeting Climate Goals

The Sizewell C project is tightly linked to Britain’s net‑zero commitments. By 2050, the government aims to eliminate all carbon emissions from the power sector. Renewable sources such as wind and solar will play a huge part, but they are inherently intermittent. Nuclear, in contrast, offers a stable, “base‑load” supply that can run continuously regardless of weather conditions.

A BBC analysis of the UK’s decarbonisation pathway shows that, without nuclear, the country would need to double its wind and solar output by 2035 to keep the energy system reliable. That would mean a massive acceleration of infrastructure, with associated grid upgrades and storage solutions that could strain the national budget.

Moreover, nuclear’s ability to generate large amounts of low‑carbon electricity is crucial for other sectors that are harder to electrify, such as heavy industry and aviation. By producing clean power for industrial users, Sizewell C could help decarbonise those hard‑to‑heat sectors and meet the UK’s “green steel” targets.

Environmental and Public Concerns

While the economics of nuclear are increasingly under scrutiny, environmentalists and local residents remain wary. The primary concerns include:

• Spent Fuel and Waste Management: Nuclear reactors produce high‑level radioactive waste that requires safe, long‑term storage. The UK’s current plan, as outlined in the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s strategy, involves temporary storage on site until a permanent disposal solution is found. Critics argue that the nation has not yet secured a long‑term repository, raising doubts about waste safety.

• Marine Impacts: The plant’s construction will involve substantial marine works, including a 1.4 km long access road that will disturb the Suffolk coastline. The BBC’s follow‑up article on the “Sizewell Marine Construction Project” highlighted potential effects on fish habitats and local tourism.

• Safety: Despite decades of safety improvements, the memory of Fukushima and Chernobyl keeps nuclear skeptics alert. The British government has pledged to apply the “lowest reasonable risk” principle, but the debate continues.

In response, EDF and the Ministry of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (BEIS) have promised extensive community engagement, including a dedicated “community benefit fund” aimed at local projects such as flood defenses, green space upgrades, and educational programmes.

The Political Landscape

Politically, the project sits at the intersection of ambition and controversy. The energy minister, Lucy Frazer, has framed the project as a “once‑in‑a‑generation” investment. In a recent parliamentary debate, she argued that the plant would create 6,000 construction jobs and a permanent workforce of 800 during operation. Her opponents – notably the Green Party and several Labour MPs – accused the government of pushing forward a fossil‑fuel‑era technology without sufficient scrutiny of climate alternatives.

The decision will ultimately require approval from the UK Parliament, with a vote expected in the next legislative session. Until then, the project remains “in principle” and subject to further environmental impact assessments and public consultations.

What Comes Next?

If the bill passes, the construction phase is slated to begin in 2025, with first electricity flowing into the national grid by 2031. The project’s “soft‑start” will involve phased commissioning, allowing operators to refine performance before fully ramping up output.

In the broader picture, the Sizewell C decision underscores a pivotal trend in the UK’s energy policy: a willingness to diversify the energy mix with a blend of renewables, nuclear, and, possibly, hydrogen. The BBC’s extensive coverage of the national energy strategy documents suggests that the government sees nuclear as a bridge technology, keeping supply stable while renewable penetration climbs.

In Closing

The Sizewell C project represents more than a new power station. It is a litmus test of Britain’s willingness to balance the urgent need for low‑carbon power with the public’s demands for safety, environmental protection, and economic prudence. Whether the plant will become a cornerstone of the nation’s climate strategy or a flashpoint of public dissent remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the conversation has already begun, and its outcomes will shape the UK’s energy trajectory for decades to come.