N※N

The 60/40 Portfolio Is Alive and Well - The New York Times

The Resurgence of the 60/40 Portfolio: A Timeless Strategy in a Turbulent Market

In the ever-evolving world of investing, few strategies have endured as long as the classic 60/40 portfolio—a balanced mix of 60 percent stocks and 40 percent bonds designed to provide growth through equities while offering stability and income from fixed-income securities. For decades, this approach has been a cornerstone for individual investors, pension funds, and financial advisors alike, promising a hedge against volatility by leveraging the inverse relationship between stocks and bonds. When stocks falter, bonds typically rise, and vice versa, creating a natural diversification that smooths out returns over time. But recent years have tested this venerable model like never before, prompting heated debates about its relevance in an era of high inflation, rising interest rates, and geopolitical uncertainties. As we reflect on the market's performance in 2023, it appears the 60/40 portfolio is staging a remarkable comeback, defying naysayers who declared it obsolete just a year ago.

To understand this revival, it's essential to revisit the turmoil of 2022, a year that many investors would prefer to forget. That period marked one of the worst performances for the 60/40 strategy in modern history. Both stocks and bonds suffered simultaneous declines, a rare occurrence driven by aggressive interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve aimed at combating runaway inflation. The S&P 500, a benchmark for U.S. equities, plummeted by about 18 percent, while the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, a proxy for bonds, dropped nearly 13 percent. This double whammy resulted in a staggering loss of around 16 percent for a typical 60/40 portfolio, according to data from Vanguard. The culprit? Inflation surged to levels not seen since the 1980s, eroding bond values as yields rose sharply. Stocks, meanwhile, were battered by recession fears, supply chain disruptions lingering from the pandemic, and the onset of the Ukraine conflict, which spiked energy prices and global instability.

Financial experts at the time sounded the alarm. Critics argued that the 60/40 model was a relic of a low-interest-rate environment that had persisted since the 2008 financial crisis. In that era, bonds provided reliable yields and acted as a ballast during stock market dips. But with rates climbing, bonds lost their luster as safe havens, correlating more closely with equities in their downward trajectory. Some pundits, including prominent voices from firms like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, suggested alternatives: incorporating commodities, real estate, or even cryptocurrencies to diversify beyond traditional assets. Others advocated for a more dynamic allocation, perhaps shifting to 50/50 or tilting heavier toward stocks for younger investors with longer time horizons. The narrative was clear: the 60/40 was broken, a victim of changing economic dynamics where persistent inflation could keep rates elevated, diminishing the appeal of bonds.

Yet, 2023 has painted a different picture, breathing new life into this tried-and-true strategy. As of late in the year, a standard 60/40 portfolio has rebounded impressively, posting gains of approximately 10 to 12 percent, depending on the specific indices used. This turnaround is fueled by a robust stock market rally, particularly in technology and growth sectors, where the "Magnificent Seven" companies—think Apple, Microsoft, and Nvidia—have driven the Nasdaq to new heights amid excitement over artificial intelligence and easing recession worries. Bonds, too, have stabilized and even appreciated as inflation cools and the Fed signals a potential pause in rate hikes. Yields on 10-year Treasuries, which peaked above 5 percent earlier in the year, have moderated, allowing bond prices to recover. This inverse correlation has reasserted itself, with bonds providing a cushion during brief stock pullbacks, such as those triggered by regional banking scares in the spring.

Experts are now reassessing their earlier pessimism. Take, for instance, the perspective from Vanguard's chief investment officer, who has emphasized that the 60/40's poor showing in 2022 was an anomaly, not the norm. Historical data supports this: over the past century, the strategy has delivered average annual returns of about 8 to 9 percent, outpacing inflation and providing retirees with steady income. A study by Morningstar reinforces this, showing that even after accounting for the 2022 debacle, a 60/40 portfolio has outperformed more aggressive all-stock portfolios in terms of risk-adjusted returns over multi-decade periods. The key, they argue, lies in its simplicity and low costs—investors can replicate it easily through index funds or ETFs, avoiding the pitfalls of market timing or active management, which often underperform benchmarks.

Of course, the resurgence doesn't mean the 60/40 is without flaws or immune to future challenges. Inflation remains a wildcard; if it reignites, bonds could again suffer. Moreover, with bond yields now higher than they've been in years—offering around 4 to 5 percent on government securities—investors might question whether the 40 percent allocation is sufficient for income needs, especially for those in or nearing retirement. Some advisors recommend tweaks, such as incorporating international bonds or inflation-protected securities (TIPS) to enhance resilience. Others suggest a "barbell" approach, combining high-quality bonds with a smattering of high-growth stocks to balance safety and upside potential.

Broader economic trends also play a role in the portfolio's viability. The Federal Reserve's pivot toward data-dependent policy-making has introduced uncertainty, but it has also created opportunities. If rates begin to fall in 2024, as many economists predict, bonds could see capital gains, boosting the 40 percent sleeve. Meanwhile, stocks benefit from a resilient U.S. economy, with unemployment low and consumer spending holding up despite headwinds. Geopolitical risks, from Middle East tensions to U.S.-China trade frictions, underscore the need for diversification, which the 60/40 inherently provides.

For everyday investors, the lesson from this rollercoaster is one of patience and perspective. Chasing hot trends or overhauling a portfolio based on one bad year can lead to costly mistakes. As one financial planner put it, "The 60/40 isn't dead; it's just been through a stress test and come out stronger." This sentiment echoes among retirees who rely on the strategy for drawdowns, where the bond portion funds living expenses without eroding principal during market downturns. Younger investors, too, can use it as a foundation, perhaps layering on more equities for growth.

Looking ahead, the 60/40's future hinges on several factors. Will inflation stabilize at the Fed's 2 percent target, allowing bonds to regain their defensive role? Can stocks sustain their momentum without a recession? Analysts from firms like J.P. Morgan project modest but positive returns for the strategy in the coming years, estimating 6 to 7 percent annually, adjusted for inflation. This is lower than the historical average but still compelling compared to cash or single-asset classes.

In essence, the 60/40 portfolio embodies the timeless investing principle of not putting all eggs in one basket. Its revival in 2023 serves as a reminder that markets are cyclical, and what seems broken in one environment can thrive in another. For those willing to stay the course, it offers a balanced path through uncertainty, blending the thrill of stocks with the steadiness of bonds. As the investment landscape continues to shift, this classic approach may well remain a beacon for prudent wealth-building, proving that sometimes, simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full The New York Times Article at:
[ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/01/business/60-40-portfolio-investing-stocks-bonds.html ]