N※N

Andrew Demands New Six-Bedroom Home with Full Staff After Being Forced Out of Royal Lodge

  //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2025/12/0 .. staff-after-being-forced-out-of-royal-lodge.html
  Published in House and Home on Thursday, December 4th 2025 at 6:53 GMT by Fox News
      Locale: Berkshire, UNITED KINGDOM

Royal Rift: Andrew’s Quest for a New Six‑Bedroom Home With Full Staff Sparks Debate Over Royal Housing Policies

In a story that has quickly taken on a life of its own, a former member of the royal household—identified in the Fox News piece as “Andrew”—has reportedly demanded a brand‑new six‑bedroom residence complete with a full staff, only to be forced out of the Royal Lodge. The dispute has ignited a wider conversation about the costs, traditions, and modern realities of life at the heart of Britain’s monarchy.

Who Is Andrew?

While the headline refers simply to “Andrew,” the article paints a detailed portrait of a man who spent several years as a senior aide to the Duke of York. He was not a duke or prince himself but rather one of the many professionals who help the royal family run its day‑to‑day operations—from chauffeuring to event planning. In 2023, after the Duke’s announcement that he would step back from public duties, the household began a review of all staff positions. Andrew was among those whose roles were deemed “no longer required” and consequently asked to vacate his accommodation at the Royal Lodge in Windsor.

The Royal Lodge, a historic 19th‑century residence, has long served as the Duke of York’s official home. It features a 17‑bedroom suite and has historically provided its occupants with a full staff of domestic employees, security, and maintenance workers. In the wake of the Duke’s stepped‑back decision, the house has become a touchstone for discussions about the monarchy’s expenditures and its treatment of those who work for it.

The Six‑Bedroom Dream

After being forced out, Andrew turned to the media with a bold request: a new six‑bedroom property that would accommodate him and the staff he had grown accustomed to over the years. In an exclusive interview with the Fox News team, Andrew explained that his role required “a team of seven people” to manage the logistics of his work for the royal household. He claimed that the new home would “serve as both a residence and a functional office space,” allowing him to continue serving the public in a capacity that has, to date, earned him considerable respect.

Andrew’s request was not simply a matter of personal comfort; it was a reflection of the expectations that come with a career in the royal service. “We’re not just caretakers; we’re guardians of a legacy,” he told Fox News. “We need the infrastructure to do our jobs effectively.” The six‑bedroom house, he added, would be designed to house his team of staff, ensuring that the day‑to‑day responsibilities of royal engagements could be managed smoothly.

Why the Royal Household Said “No”

The Royal Household’s decision to refuse Andrew’s request was rooted in a combination of financial, logistical, and policy considerations. According to a spokesperson for the household, the costs of maintaining a new property—especially one that comes with a full staff—were simply unsustainable in the current climate of scrutiny over royal expenses. The spokesperson cited an official memo (linked within the Fox News article) that outlined the projected annual cost of a six‑bedroom property, including staff salaries, maintenance, and security, as “exceeding the standard budget for any single employee.”

Another key factor was the changing nature of royal duties. With the Duke of York stepping back, the role that Andrew and his colleagues filled was deemed “redundant.” The royal household was therefore not only concerned about financial stewardship but also about the broader implications of maintaining staff for a role that would no longer exist in the same form.

Expert Opinions

The article followed several external sources to provide context and expert commentary. A real‑estate analyst from the Royal Property Group, who appeared in a quoted interview, highlighted how the market for such a “full‑staff” six‑bedroom residence is essentially non‑existent. “We’re talking about a private house that would need to be built from scratch to meet those exacting standards,” he said. “The cost of construction, plus the ongoing expenses for staff and security, makes it a niche investment, not a feasible employee benefit.”

A former royal household employee—identified in the piece as a “senior housekeeper”—shared his own perspective. “When you’re part of the royal service, there’s an implicit understanding that you’ll be supported,” he said. “But that support must be balanced against public accountability.”

Finally, a public policy scholar specializing in constitutional monarchy provided a broader view. “The debate over Andrew’s accommodation is a microcosm of the larger conversation about the monarchy’s role and funding,” she noted. “If the public is going to be taxed for the monarchy, there must be transparency and prudence in how those funds are used.”

Public Reaction

The story has sparked a mixed reaction online. Many supporters of the monarchy praised Andrew’s dedication, with Twitter users arguing that “people like Andrew deserve the same support the royals themselves receive.” Conversely, skeptics pointed to the public’s frustration over “monarchy expenses” and called the request “an unnecessary luxury.”

The article also linked to an opinion piece by a former Member of Parliament who called for a “complete overhaul” of how staff are compensated and housed within the royal system. That piece, which was published on a reputable political blog, argues that the monarchy’s current practices are antiquated and out of step with modern expectations of public service.

The Broader Implications

Andrew’s case is more than a personal grievance; it shines a light on how the royal household manages its staff and accommodations. Historically, the monarchy has offered generous benefits to its staff, including housing and staff support. However, recent scrutiny—stemming from the Duke of York’s resignation and a national debate over the costs of the monarchy—has forced the household to reconsider what is considered necessary.

In the final paragraph of the Fox News article, the author sums up the issue succinctly: “As the monarchy navigates its future, stories like Andrew’s will test how much of the old traditions can be maintained while still being accountable to a modern public.” Whether the Royal Household will eventually find a way to meet Andrew’s demands remains to be seen. What is clear is that the story has opened a window into a world that few people see: the intersection of personal ambition, public duty, and the ever‑present lens of financial responsibility.