Sat, July 19, 2025
Fri, July 18, 2025
Thu, July 17, 2025
Mon, July 14, 2025
Sat, July 12, 2025
Fri, July 11, 2025
Thu, July 10, 2025
Wed, July 9, 2025
Tue, July 8, 2025
Mon, July 7, 2025
Sat, July 5, 2025
Fri, July 4, 2025
Thu, July 3, 2025
Wed, July 2, 2025
Tue, July 1, 2025
Mon, June 30, 2025
Sun, June 29, 2025
Sat, June 28, 2025
Fri, June 27, 2025
Thu, June 26, 2025
Wed, June 25, 2025
Tue, June 24, 2025
Mon, June 23, 2025
Sun, June 22, 2025
Sat, June 21, 2025
Fri, June 20, 2025
[ Fri, Jun 20th ]: WGME
How to get a mortgage
Thu, June 19, 2025

Updated list of all Trump''s actions that impact housing

  Copy link into your clipboard //house-home.news-articles.net/content/2025/07/1 .. -of-all-trump-s-actions-that-impact-housing.html
  Print publication without navigation Published in House and Home on by HousingWire
          🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source
  Here are the actions the Trump administration or Congress have taken that impact housing since President Trump took office on Jan. 20, 2025.

- Click to Lock Slider

Trump's Housing Legacy: A Detailed Examination of Policies and Actions Shaping the Market


As the Trump administration concluded its term, its impact on the U.S. housing sector remains a topic of intense scrutiny among policymakers, industry experts, and homeowners alike. From regulatory rollbacks to high-profile appointments and responses to economic crises, President Donald Trump's actions have left an indelible mark on housing affordability, development, and finance. This comprehensive summary draws from an updated compilation of key initiatives, executive orders, and policy shifts that directly or indirectly influenced the housing landscape. While some measures aimed to stimulate growth and reduce bureaucratic hurdles, others sparked debates over equity, environmental protections, and long-term market stability. Below, we delve into the major categories of these actions, highlighting their intentions, implementations, and broader implications.

Key Appointments and Leadership Changes at HUD


One of the earliest and most visible moves was the nomination and confirmation of Dr. Ben Carson as Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in March 2017. Carson, a retired neurosurgeon with no prior housing policy experience, was tasked with overseeing an agency responsible for affordable housing programs, fair housing enforcement, and urban development initiatives. His tenure emphasized deregulation and public-private partnerships, often prioritizing efficiency over expansive social welfare programs. Critics argued that his lack of expertise led to delays in addressing housing shortages, while supporters praised his focus on self-sufficiency and reducing dependency on government aid.

Supporting Carson were several key appointees, including Lynne Patton as HUD's regional administrator for New York and New Jersey, and later as head of Region II. Patton, a former event planner for the Trump family, brought a unique perspective but faced criticism for her handling of public housing issues in high-need areas. Another notable figure was Brian Montgomery, who served as FHA Commissioner and later as Deputy HUD Secretary. Montgomery's experience in housing finance helped steer policies toward stabilizing mortgage markets, particularly through reforms at the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).

These appointments set the tone for the administration's housing agenda, signaling a shift toward conservative, market-driven approaches rather than expansive federal interventions.

Regulatory Reforms and Deregulation Efforts


A cornerstone of Trump's housing policy was deregulation, aimed at spurring construction and economic growth. In January 2017, an executive order mandated that for every new regulation, two existing ones must be eliminated—a directive that HUD embraced by reviewing and rolling back Obama-era rules. One significant action was the suspension and eventual revision of the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) rule in July 2020. Originally designed to combat segregation and promote equitable housing access, the rule was criticized by the administration as overly burdensome on local governments. Its replacement, the Preserving Community and Neighborhood Choice rule, gave communities more flexibility but was decried by civil rights groups as a step back from addressing systemic discrimination.

Environmental regulations also saw changes with housing implications. The administration's rollback of the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule in 2019 reduced federal oversight of wetlands, potentially easing development on previously protected lands. This was part of a broader push to streamline permitting processes under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which Trump reformed in July 2020 to accelerate infrastructure and housing projects. Proponents argued these changes would boost supply in high-demand areas, lowering prices, while opponents warned of environmental risks and unchecked urban sprawl.

In the realm of building codes, the administration influenced standards through appointments to bodies like the International Code Council, promoting energy-efficient but less stringent requirements. Additionally, efforts to reform the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) in May 2020 aimed to modernize how banks invest in low-income communities, though the changes were met with mixed reactions—some saw it as encouraging more lending for housing, others as diluting anti-redlining protections.

Tax Policies and Their Housing Ripple Effects


The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of December 2017 stands out as a monumental policy with profound housing impacts. By capping the state and local tax (SALT) deduction at $10,000 and limiting mortgage interest deductions to loans up to $750,000 (down from $1 million), the law altered incentives for homeownership, particularly in high-tax, high-cost states like California and New York. This shift was intended to simplify the tax code and stimulate business investment, but it contributed to cooling in luxury housing markets and prompted some buyers to reconsider large mortgages.

The act also introduced Opportunity Zones, designating economically distressed areas for tax incentives on investments, including real estate development. By 2019, billions flowed into these zones, funding multifamily housing and commercial projects. While hailed for revitalizing blighted neighborhoods, critics pointed to gentrification risks and uneven benefits, with wealthier investors often reaping the rewards rather than local residents.

Housing Finance Reform and GSE Overhaul


Trump's administration took steps toward reforming government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which back a significant portion of U.S. mortgages. In September 2019, the Treasury Department released a housing finance reform plan proposing to end the conservatorship of the GSEs, increase private capital in the market, and reduce taxpayer exposure. This built on earlier actions, such as the 2018 nomination of Mark Calabria as Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), who advocated for recapitalizing the GSEs and preparing them for privatization.

Calabria's leadership led to rules in 2020 that raised capital requirements for Fannie and Freddie, aiming to make them more resilient but potentially increasing borrowing costs for homebuyers. The administration also pushed for greater competition in the secondary mortgage market, though full privatization remained elusive amid congressional gridlock.

Responses to Crises: COVID-19 and Eviction Moratoriums


The COVID-19 pandemic thrust housing into the spotlight, prompting swift executive actions. In March 2020, Trump signed the CARES Act, which included a 120-day moratorium on evictions for federally backed mortgages and multifamily properties, covering about 28 million renters. This was extended multiple times, with HUD allocating billions in emergency rental assistance to prevent a wave of homelessness amid widespread job losses.

FHA policies were adjusted to offer forbearance on mortgages, allowing borrowers to pause payments without penalty. The administration also directed funds toward housing for the homeless through programs like the Emergency Solutions Grants, though implementation faced challenges in distribution and equity.

Beyond the pandemic, responses to natural disasters influenced housing. For instance, after hurricanes in 2017 and 2018, Trump approved disaster relief funding that included housing reconstruction aid, though some allocations were criticized for delays and favoritism toward certain states.

Immigration, Trade, and Broader Economic Policies


Immigration policies under Trump had indirect but significant housing effects. Stricter enforcement and reduced visas for construction workers exacerbated labor shortages in the building industry, driving up costs and slowing new home construction. The "public charge" rule, finalized in August 2019, made it harder for immigrants to access benefits, potentially deterring low-income families from seeking affordable housing programs.

Trade policies, including tariffs on steel, aluminum, and lumber imposed in 2018, increased material costs for homebuilders. These tariffs, part of a broader trade war with China and Canada, contributed to rising home prices, with lumber costs spiking by over 100% at times. While aimed at protecting domestic industries, they strained affordability for first-time buyers.

Opportunity and Inclusion Initiatives


The administration launched the Opportunity and Revitalization Council in December 2018, chaired by Carson, to coordinate federal efforts in Opportunity Zones and promote economic development in underserved areas. This included housing components like incentives for affordable units. Additionally, the "Eviction Moratorium" and related policies during COVID highlighted a focus on stability, though often temporary.

Trump also signed an executive order in June 2020 promoting "school choice" and tying it to housing vouchers, allowing families to use Section 8 funds in better school districts—a move seen as enhancing mobility but criticized for not addressing root causes of inequality.

Legacy and Ongoing Debates


In total, these actions reflect a philosophy of deregulation, market incentives, and targeted interventions, often prioritizing economic growth over expansive social programs. Supporters credit them with record-low unemployment pre-pandemic and booming home sales, while detractors argue they exacerbated inequality, weakened fair housing protections, and failed to tackle the affordability crisis head-on. With home prices soaring and inventory low, the long-term effects continue to unfold under subsequent administrations.

As the housing market evolves, understanding these policies provides crucial context for future reforms. Whether through tax incentives, regulatory tweaks, or crisis responses, Trump's tenure reshaped the sector in ways that will influence American homes for years to come.

(Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full HousingWire Article at:
[ https://www.housingwire.com/articles/updated-list-of-all-trumps-actions-that-impact-housing/ ]