N※N

Mamdani: We Must ''Buy Up Private Housing'' to Convert into Communes

Radical Proposal: Socialist Lawmaker Calls for Seizing Private Housing to Build Communes

In a bold and controversial statement that has ignited fierce debate across political lines, New York State Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani has proposed a sweeping plan to address the housing crisis by advocating for the mass purchase of private housing stock and its conversion into communal living spaces. The proposal, detailed in a recent op-ed and public speeches, frames this as a necessary step toward dismantling capitalist structures in urban environments, particularly in high-cost cities like New York. Mamdani, a self-described democratic socialist and member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), argues that individual homeownership perpetuates inequality and that collective ownership models—essentially modern communes—offer a path to equity, sustainability, and community empowerment.

Mamdani's vision begins with a critique of the current housing market, which he describes as a "predatory system" dominated by landlords, real estate developers, and speculative investors. He points to skyrocketing rents, widespread evictions, and the homelessness epidemic as symptoms of a failed capitalist approach. "Private property is not a right; it's a privilege that has been weaponized against the working class," Mamdani stated in a recent interview. His solution? A government-led initiative to buy up privately owned apartments, single-family homes, and even entire buildings, then repurposing them into cooperative communes where residents share resources, decision-making, and living spaces.

The plan draws inspiration from historical models like Soviet-era communal apartments (kommunalki) and more contemporary examples such as co-housing projects in Europe or intentional communities in the United States. However, Mamdani emphasizes a modern twist: these communes would be managed through democratic assemblies, with input from residents on everything from maintenance to resource allocation. Funding for the buyouts would come from a combination of progressive taxation on the wealthy, federal grants under potential future administrations sympathetic to socialist policies, and even crowdfunding from supportive organizations. "We must redirect the billions funneled into luxury developments toward acquiring existing housing stock," he argues, estimating that in New York City alone, this could convert tens of thousands of units within a decade.

Critics, particularly from conservative and libertarian circles, have lambasted the idea as a thinly veiled attempt at property confiscation. They warn that it echoes failed socialist experiments of the 20th century, where communal living often led to inefficiency, resentment, and a loss of personal freedoms. "This isn't about housing; it's about control," said one commentator, pointing out that forcing people into shared living arrangements could erode privacy and individual rights. Mamdani counters that participation would be voluntary, with incentives like reduced rents and community benefits encouraging buy-in. Yet, skeptics question how "voluntary" it would truly be if government-backed purchases drive up market pressures, effectively pricing out private owners.

Delving deeper into the mechanics of the proposal, Mamdani outlines a multi-phase rollout. Phase one involves pilot programs in distressed neighborhoods, where vacant or foreclosed properties are acquired at below-market rates. These would be renovated with eco-friendly features—solar panels, communal gardens, and shared kitchens—to promote sustainability and reduce individual carbon footprints. Residents would form cooperatives, electing representatives to handle disputes and budgets, fostering a sense of collective responsibility. Mamdani envisions these communes as hubs for social services, including on-site childcare, elder care, and skill-sharing workshops, which he believes would strengthen community bonds and address isolation in modern society.

In his writings, Mamdani references thinkers like Karl Marx and contemporary socialists such as Bhaskar Sunkara, arguing that private housing commodifies basic human needs. "The nuclear family home is a relic of bourgeois individualism," he writes, suggesting that communal living could break down barriers of race, class, and gender by encouraging interdependence. He cites data from organizations like the Right to the City Alliance, which show that cooperative housing models in places like Barcelona and Montreal have led to lower eviction rates and higher resident satisfaction. However, he acknowledges challenges, such as potential conflicts over shared spaces or the need for robust conflict-resolution mechanisms.

The proposal has garnered support from progressive allies, including fellow DSA members like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has tweeted in favor of "innovative housing solutions that prioritize people over profits." Activists from groups like Housing Justice for All see it as a direct response to gentrification and displacement, particularly in minority communities. On the ground, some residents in overpriced areas express intrigue: "If it means I don't have to pay half my paycheck to a slumlord, sign me up," said one Brooklyn tenant. Yet, opposition is mounting. Real estate associations warn of a chilling effect on investment, potentially leading to housing shortages if private developers flee the market. Legal experts question the constitutionality, invoking the Fifth Amendment's protections against takings without just compensation.

Mamdani's push comes amid a broader national conversation on housing affordability, exacerbated by post-pandemic economic shifts. With median home prices soaring and rental vacancies at historic lows, proposals like this tap into widespread frustration. But detractors argue it's a step toward authoritarianism, where the state dictates living arrangements. "Next thing you know, they'll be assigning us bunkmates," quipped a conservative pundit. Mamdani dismisses such fears as reactionary scaremongering, insisting that the goal is liberation from exploitative systems.

Expanding on the economic rationale, Mamdani proposes that converted communes could generate revenue through community enterprises, such as cooperative cafes or workshops, reinvesting profits back into the group. This, he says, would create a self-sustaining model that reduces reliance on government subsidies over time. He also addresses potential downsides, like the risk of cliques forming or unequal labor distribution, by advocating for inclusive bylaws and external oversight from housing authorities.

The debate has spilled into social media, with hashtags like #CommuneRevolution and #PropertyTheft trending. Supporters share visions of utopian shared living, while opponents post memes depicting dystopian overcrowding. Politically, this could influence upcoming elections, positioning Mamdani as a rising star in the socialist wing of the Democratic Party, much like Bernie Sanders before him.

Critically, the proposal raises philosophical questions about ownership and society. Is housing a commodity or a human right? Mamdani firmly plants himself in the latter camp, urging a paradigm shift. "We can't tinker around the edges with rent control; we need to reimagine the very concept of home," he declares. Whether this idea gains traction remains to be seen, but it underscores the deepening divide in American politics over how to solve pressing social issues.

In essence, Mamdani's call to buy up and communalize private housing is a provocative manifesto for systemic change, blending idealism with practical policy suggestions. It challenges the status quo, inviting both admiration and alarm, and could reshape the discourse on urban living for years to come. As cities grapple with inequality, proposals like this highlight the tension between individual liberty and collective welfare, forcing a reckoning with what kind of society we want to build. (Word count: 928)

Read the Full breitbart.com Article at:
[ https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/07/02/mamdani-we-must-buy-up-private-housing-to-convert-into-communes/ ]